Sudan Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Sudan - Essay Example The government and the opposition had different views of what happened, and this resulted in divergent understanding of the cause of the problem. The government maintained that the international communitys failure to condemn a coup encouraged Machar. On the contrary, the opposition maintained that Kiir and some members of Dinka used the fight as an excuse to attack rivals and carry out atrocities against Nuer in Juba. The government was at the same time looking for strategies to maintain an internal cohesion, appropriate political reforms, and diversity management strategies since it was perceived to be Dinka-dominated. Both Kiir and Machar delegations were sent for peace talks in Ethiopia. The conflicts occurred as a result of attempts to control territories along the border between North and South. The North was fighting rebellions around its periphery in South Kordofan, Blue Nile, and Abyei (Fearon &Laitin, 2003). These are the same areas it fought against before South became independent. Conflicts in the areas resulted due to the presence of various armed rebels, which is much different from an economic warfare knowing the two nations focused on oil allocation. Thus, an agreement between North and South would not probably settle the conflicts at the border since the local populations were mobilized, and liberation movements formed. The CPA that had ended the 19 years civil war (1983-2005) was negotiated between the South Sudan movement SPLM/A, and Sudans ruling National Congress Party (NCP). This excluded other groups in both North and South. However, most groups from South were absorbed in the SPLM/A (Crisis Group interviews, 2013). During the critical period of CPA, most of the issues were not reconciled. Today, many communities in Sudan continue to align themselves with military factions. For this reason, the conflict has remained to be some sought of

Facebook IPO Article Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Facebook IPO - Article Example This will make Facebook the world’s leading social network by capitalization considering that its value will stand at $104 billion at the share offering. The social network is on course to raise $16 billion through its initial public offer. The company will certainly rank among major share offering in the United States taking into consideration that Facebook stands third behind Visa and General Motors. The IPO has undoubtedly portrayed a profound revolution and growth of the company, which was formed eight years ago in Harvard as a dormitory project. The social network will be issuing 420 million common stock shares of which Facebook will sell 180 million of its share while an additional of 241 million shares will come from previous shareholders. After the initial public offer Facebook will be ranked among the most valuable US technology corporations, where key players such as Amazon, Google, Cisco and Apple owns the majority stake in the industry. Background Facebook is the w idely known and used social network. Facebook first entry was in 2004 and had accumulated over one million users within one year. Statistics shows that the number was around 100 million users in December 2008 and 200 million in June 2009, which is doubling of the figure in six months period. Currently, this social network is globally recognized and available in 4 languages (English, French, Spanish and German) and sources say it is spreading its wings to include 22 more languages (Weir, 2008). Facebook is preferred for its user-friendly applications, such as Facebook Online Chat, launched in 2008 and this feature is a popular real time messaging market applications. Facebook is a global with hundreds of millions people using it to inter-connect and check in on friends/relatives, upload photos, share videos and links, meet new friends and have updates of how their friends are fairing (Facebook, 2010). Market Competition According to Nick Wingfield, author of the article, Apple vs Fac ebook, these two companies are not big rivals or competitors. According to the author the companies’ relations is comparative to the relationship between United States and China. These companies have immense powers in their own right. They are neither friends, nor hostile to each other. The apparent reason why Apple and Facebook are not rivals is because Facebook don’t develop operating system, computers, mobiles and tablets. Implications for Competition (Rivalry among the Companies) Apple’s social network, Ping, is not such popular apart from its users who have musical preferences on iTunes. It is obvious that its creation was not meant to challenge Facebook. Apple’s late CEO, Steven P. Jobs, professed that he admired the Facebook CEO and co-founder Mr. Mark Zuckerberg. He hailed praises to Mr. Zuckerberg for his role of trying to build a lasting Silicon Valley company and not selling it. Recently, tension has been realized between the two companies. Aft er Ping introduction to the market two years ago, the two companies could not agree on how to integrate Facebook with the Ping services. This would have enabled users to use Ping to interact with their Facebook friends. Mr. Jobs told one of the reporters that Apple could not work with Facebook on the Ping issue as Facebook was demanding difficult terms they could not agree on. Strategic Alliances Facebook launched alliances in the summer of 2008, with Netflix and Apple to promote Facebook Connect. With regards to Apple, the platform allowed Apple to use Facebook Connect to promote its products. Netflix members were able to link their Facebook and netflix accounts through the Facebook Connect. This helped to expand communication by making it possible for Netflix users to